Nonreferral (58%) was the most common reason that eligible patien

Nonreferral (58%) was the most common reason that eligible patients did not receive an ICD. Patients were not referred for ICD because of appropriate contraindications

in 26% of cases. Overall mortality was 29% (15% with and 31% without ICD). In the LVEF <= 30% group an ICD was implanted in 33% of 388 eligible patients. Nonreferral (51%) was the most common reason that eligible patients did not receive an ICD. Patients were not referred for ICD because of appropriate contraindications in 24% of cases. Overall mortality was 28% (18% with and 32% without ICD).

Conclusions: After the publication of MADIT-II and SCD-HeFT, only 42% of eligible patients with LVEF <= 35% and 49% of patients with LVEF <= 30% were offered a potentially life-saving

Ulixertinib ICD between 2002 and 2006 in our medical center, sometimes with considerable delay. (PACE 2009; 32:S194-S197)”
“We analysed the impact of the Xpert (R) MTB/RIF molecular test on health-care diagnostic delay among tuberculosis patients. Diagnostic delay was 17.2 days (standard deviation 23.2, median 10 days). Of 128 patients recruited into the study, 60 (47%) were smear-negative; of these, 40 (67%) were Xpert-positive and were started on treatment without culture. The sensitivity of smear microscopy was 53% compared with 82% for Xpert. In smear-negative patients, delay in Xpert-positive and -negative patients was respectively 15.5 +/- 13.2 and 25.5 +/- 12.5 days (P = 0.002). We conclude that Xpert results were significantly associated with shorter health-care diagnostic delay, particularly Ruboxistaurin mw in smear-negative patients.”
“The surfaces of solar cells are often textured to increase their capacity to absorb light. This optical benefit is partially offset, however, by an increase in carrier recombination at or near the textured surface. A review of past work shows that the additional recombination invoked by a textured surface varies

greatly from one experiment NSC23766 supplier to another. For example, in the most commonly investigated structure-pyramidal textured silicon diffused with phosphorus and passivated with a hydrogenated oxide-recombination ranges from being 1-12 times more than in an equivalently prepared planar 100 surface. Examination of these experiments reveals consistent trends: small increases in recombination occur when the surface is very heavily diffused and dominated by Auger recombination, while larger increases in recombination occur when the surface is lightly diffused and dominated by Shockley-Read-Hall recombination at the surface, making the latter depend critically on surface area and the density of surface states. Comparisons of pyramidal and planar 100 surfaces indicate that when lightly diffused, the difference in recombination is substantially greater than the difference in surface area (1.73) and it is regularly attributed to the pyramid facets having 111 orientations-well known for their higher density of dangling bonds than 100 orientations.

Comments are closed.