those after 6 weeks (n = 36) Consequences 25.7 (5.5) vs. 29.4(5.8)** Timeline: 8.3 (2.4) vs. 9.8 (2.7)* Cure/control: 23.9 (4.4)
vs. 23.6 (3.4) ns Identity: 7.5(3.6) vs. 8.4 (3.2) ns A− B? C+ D? E− Cross-sectional studies Boot 2008 Nether-lands Association between work disability and illness perceptions Population: various chronic physical diseases: n = 552 Mean age employed (sd): 44.2 (10.2) Mean age fully work-disabled: 52.4 (8.6) Patients from National database of medically diagnosed chronic patients, selected from 51 general practitioner selleckchem practices IPQ-Revised Consequences Timeline (chronic and cyclical) Control (treatment and personal) Coherence Cause (psychological, risk factors, immunity) Statements scored 1–5 (1:strongly disagree, 5: strongly agree) Employment status CHIR-99021 order defined as employed (working >12 h per week) or fully work-disabled (loss of salary earnings of 20% or more compared
to previous job) Questionnaire data Comparisons between employed (n = 363) vs. work disabled (n = 189) Consequences: 2.5 (0.8) vs. 3.7 (0.8)*** Timeline: Chronic 4.3 (0.8) vs. 4.4 (0.6)*, cyclical 3.1 (1.0) vs. 3.4 (1.0) *** Control: treatment 3.2(0.7) vs. 2.6 (0.8)***, personal 3.2 (0.8) vs. 2.8 (0.8)*** Coherence: 4.00 (0.8) vs. 3.6 (0.9)*** Causal dimension (psychological): 2.0 (0.8) vs. 2.2 (0.9)**, risk factors 2.0 (0.7) vs. 2.0 (0.7) ns, immunity 2.1 (0.9) vs. 2.2 (0.8) ns Multivariate logistic regression analyses: After controlling for socio-demographic variables, medical OICR-9429 mouse health status, and self-reported health status (block 1–3), only the ‘consequences’ dimension was significant in a final model including the other illness perception dimensions (block 4), i.e., an odds ratio
(OR) of 5.3 (95% CI 2.3–12.3). R-square model without IPQ items was 65.4%, and 77.4% with IPQ items (significant difference) A+ B+ C+ D+ E+ Sluiter 2008 Nether-lands Differences in illness perceptions in working versus sick listed Cell Penetrating Peptide patients Population: patients with repetitive strain injury (RSI): n = 1121 Mean age (sd): 40.8 (8.7) Sample of patients from national database of the Dutch RSI Association IPQ-Brief Consequences Timeline Control (personal, treatment) Identity Concern Comprehensibility (coherence) Emotional response Causes: open question on factors perceived to cause illness Scoring on 0–10 point scale Employment status defined as working (>8 h work previous week) or sick-listed (>1 year sick-listed, or not working previous week according to contract) Questionnaire data Comparisons between working group (n = 745 vs. sick-listed group (n = 376): Consequences: 5.6 (2.5) vs. 7.6 (2.1)*** Timeline: 8.2 (2.1) vs. 8.5(1.7) ns Control: treatment 5.7 (2.5) vs. 4.4 (2.