4b; PC1 and PC2 explaining 28% and 23% of the total variance in the fungal community data respectively). In plants inoculated with AM fungi, percent root length colonised was similar in months 1 and 3 (28% and 29% respectively, arcsine square root transformed data) and

in months 5 and 7 (56% and 52% respectively). Harvest time (single factor in ANOVA, F3,16 = 7.24, P = 0.003, MG-132 manufacturer LSD = 16) was the only factor to affect AM colonisation. Percent root length containing arbuscules followed a similar trend (harvest as a single factor, F3,16 = 9.19, P < 0.001). Hyphae and arbuscules were not observed in uninoculated plants. There was a significant positive relationship between percent root length colonised and microbial biomass-C (linear regression, P = 0.014).

Microbial biomass-C was affected by all treatments both as individual factors and as interaction terms. Most of the variation in the ANOVA was accounted for by planting regime as a single factor (F2,40 = 153.03, P < 0001; bare soil, 101 μg C g−1 soil; NM, 258 μg C g−1; AM, 164 μg C g−1; LSD = 18.2) but a planting regime × dilution interaction (F2,40 = 11.65, P < 0.001, LSD = 25.8) and a dilution × month interaction (F3,40 = 32.27, P < 0.001) were evident. Microbial biomass-C was similar in the bare soil at both dilution treatments but in the planted soils, a greater microbial biomass was present in the 10−1 amended soils ( Fig. 5). In months 3 and 5, biomass-C was greatest in the 10−1 treatments relative to the 10−6 treatments but this soil dilution effect had disappeared by month 7 (data not shown). Percentage organic carbon selleck chemical based on loss on ignition was significantly lower in the mycorrhizal planted treatments than in the non-mycorrhizal

Chlormezanone planted, or the bare soil (planting regime as a single factor, F2,57 = 27.90, P < 0.001). The carbon content of the bare soil was reduced in columns amended with the 10−1 dilution relative to those treated with the 10−6 suspension but this trend was not evident in the planted soils (planting regime × dilution interaction, F2,57 = 6.37, P = 0.003, LSD = 0.05, Fig. 5b). Soil aggregate stability (mean weight diameter, MWD) did not differ with planting regime in soils treated with the 10−6 dilution. However, MWD was significantly lower in the bare unplanted and the NM planted soils amended with the 10−1 dilution compared to equivalent planting regimes amended with the 10−6 dilution (Fig. 6a). Soils from mesocosms containing mycorrhizal plants had similar MWD values irrespective of soil dilution treatment (dilution × planting regime interaction in ANOVA, F2,56 = 4.82, LSD = 0.08, P = 0.012, Fig. 6a). Aggregates from the soil with mycorrhizal plants and from soils amended with the 10−6 dilution were more stable than those from the 10−1 bare and NM treatments, although all fall within the accepted classification as ‘stable’. Mean weight diameter (MWD) was greatest in month 3 (1.