The authors state that this model can be used in human beings. However, the central tendon of the human diaphragm is closely linked to mediastinal structures and it is therefore expected that a contraction of the healthy hemidiaphragm induces additional shortening of the paretic hemidiaphragm through the central tendon. In the case of right-side hemiplegia, the left dome and all

the intercostal, ATM signaling pathway parasternal and scalene muscles need to develop sufficient tension to induce diaphragm movement on the paralyzed side. This is hampered by the more elevated physiologic position of the right dome as well as elevation caused by the paresis present in hemiplegia (Cohen et al., 1994a, Cohen et al.,

1994b and Khedr et al., 2000). The hemiplegic individuals in the present study exhibited no significant reduction in FVC or MVV when compared to the control group. This may be partially attributed to the distribution of the neural drive to parasternal intercostal muscles (especially those in a more rostral position). This offers an important mechanical advantage to inspiration, as well as to the sitting position during this evaluation, masking the resulting lack of physiological see more visceral compression. Another possible explanation would be the various forms of cerebral lesions in the affected hemisphere, as they probably affect diaphragmatic corticospinal projections differently in each patient (Gandevia et al., 2006). Laghi and Tobin (2003) report that the ipsilateral projection of corticospinal fibers may be more significant in some patients, however, this aspect was not analyzed in our study. A reduction in FEV1, PEF and FEF25–75% was found in the hemiplegic individuals. However, as there was no clinical or spirometric evidence of airflow obstruction, respiratory infection or direct lesions in the

abdominal muscles, this may be attributed to expiratory and abdominal muscle weakness, which also compromises trunk motor control. Additionally Immune system the MAS scale reflects motor function commitment before the implementation of voluntary motor activities, by measuring trunk control, balance, walking and muscle tone, among others (Carr et al., 1985). One of limitation of this study was the small number of patients recruited. This was due to difficulties in selecting patients who met eligibility criteria, which included hemiplegia without any of the following conditions: non-comprehension of commands, inability to perform ventilometric and spirometric tests, weak trunk control, hindering the postures requested in the evaluation, history of smoking or heterogeneous lesions of the CNS.