The above results demonstrated the deposition of Ag nanoparticles on the ZnO nanorod arrays. Considering the uniform deposition and the structural maintenance, ZnO-H was the better support for the deposition of Ag nanoparticles. Figure 2 SEM images, XRD patterns, and UV–vis absorption spectra of ZnO@Ag, ZnO-H@Ag, and ZnO-A@Ag. SEM images of ( a ) ZnO@Ag, ( b ) ZnO-H@Ag, and ( c ) ZnO-A@Ag. XRD patterns ( d ) and UV–vis absorption spectra ( e ) of ZnO@Ag, ZnO-H@Ag, and ZnO-A@Ag. The photocatalytic degradation of R6G in the visible light region without and with different photocatalysts at an initial R6G concentration

of 10−5 M and 25°C was shown in Figure 3a. It was obvious that the lowest degradation rate

mTOR inhibitor was obtained in the absence of photocatalysts. In the presence of photocatalysts, the degradation rate increased in the sequence of ZnO, ZnO-A, ZnO-H, ZnO@Ag, ZnO-A@Ag, and ZnO-H@Ag. Furthermore, as indicated in Figure 3b, the photocatalytic degradation kinetics was found to follow the pseudo-first-order rate equation [10, 55, 56], where C denotes the concentration of R6G and the subscript 0 means the initial value. The corresponding rate constants (k) for the case in the absence of photocatalysts and those in the presence of ZnO, ZnO-A, ZnO-H, ZnO@Ag, ZnO-A@Ag, and ZnO-H@Ag were 5.79 × 10−4, 5.82 × 10−4, 7.26 × 10−4, 1.06 × 10−3, 2.33 × 10−3, 3.10 × BV-6 in vivo 10−3, and 1.09 × 10−2 min−1, respectively. This revealed that the deposition of Ag nanoparticles on ZnO nanorods efficiently enhanced the photocatalytic activity in the visible light region owing to the extended absorption from UV region to visible light region. Also, ZnO-H@Ag exhibited the maximum photocatalytic ability in the visible light region even if its Ag content was lower than ZnO-A@Ag. The possible reasons were as follows: (1) ZnO-H was the better support for the uniform deposition

of Ag nanoparticles and the maintenance of ZnO nanorod arrays, which made the Ag nanoparticles to be utilized efficiently; (2) hydrogen treatment led to the increase of electron mobility, which helped the rapid reaction with molecules and water to form free radicals and enhanced the photocatalytic performance; (3) after hydrogen treatment, the interstitial hydrogen could become shallow donors Histone demethylase and therefore the electrons could be Selleckchem Inhibitor Library excited easily under visible light illumination [57]. Figure 3 Photocatalytic degradation of R6G in the visible light region without and with different photocatalysts. ( a ) Remaining percentage of R6G vs. irradiation time. ( b ) ln (C/C0) vs. irradiation time. Initial R6G concentration at 10−5 M; temperature of 25°C. According to the above discussion, ZnO-H@Ag was used in the following photocatalytic study. First, the effect of Ag content on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO-H@Ag was examined.