e. facilitation triggered by

the occurrence of strong interspecific competition between adults and other plant species (Table 1). Such positive spatial associations in TAE are not surprising because they conform to the SGH (Callaway et al., 2002 and Kikvidze et al., 2005). However, to date, the growth forms of facilitators are almost exclusively giant cushions (e.g. Pérez, 1987a), giant rosettes (e.g. Young and Peacock, 1992), shrubs (e.g. Leuschner and Schulte, 1991), and tussock grasses (e.g. Kleier and Lambrinos, 2005). These large alpine plants are typical of TAE and are not found – or observed at low frequency – in temperate alpine environments TSA HDAC (but see le Roux and McGeoch, 2010, for the particular case of subantarctic islands), GDC-0980 cell line which attests to the specific nature of the positive interactions found in TAE. Data on spatial associations along global environmental gradients indirectly provide key insights on variations in the outcomes of plant–plant interactions inside and outside TAE

(see Jacobsen and Dangles, 2012 and Fugère et al., 2012 for a similar approach with TAE invertebrates). For example, data from Chile along a latitudinal gradient that spanned from the southern limit of the tropics (25°S) to subantarctic latitudes (55°S) showed that nurse cushion plants showed a maximum positive effect on species richness at 41°S, and that this effect declined uniformly northwards to the southern tropical limit (Cavieres and Badano, 2009). Also, the reinterpretation of a large data set on facilitation in extratropical alpine environments in the northern hemisphere yielded evidence that the

intensity of competition at the community level declined with increasing latitude (Kikvidze et al., 2011). These two complementary studies indicated that a lower frequency of positive interactions occurs with increasing proximity to the tropics and the poles, a hypothesis which would be interesting to test on a global scale. The direct amelioration of microhabitats is the most common mean by which nurse plants facilitate the recruitment, growth, and survival of other plants, through ‘direct mechanisms for facilitation’ (Callaway, 2007). In alpine environments, microhabitat Y-27632 2HCl amelioration by nurse plants (see also the concept of ‘creation of biogenic habitats’; Badano and Marquet, 2009) more frequently mitigates the negative effects on plants of environmental stresses that are not related directly to resources, e.g. temperature or wind, than the effects of resource-related stress (Maestre et al., 2009). In contrast, in arid environments, the same authors propose that facilitation among plants rather results from the mitigation of resource-related stress (e.g. water content of soil or macronutrients), a mechanism which may vanish under extreme stress.