Combined spatial analysis of genetically and functionally defined

interneuron populations with an assessment of quantitative contributions to the synaptic regulation of different motor neuron pools will provide answers to these questions. As has become apparent, spinal interneurons cannot be considered to be simply a limited group of local neurons shaping and modulating motor circuit function in recurrent modules. Spinal interneuron diversification is evident at the developmental level by progenitor domain origin, time of neurogenesis, migratory path, and acquisition of distinct transcriptional profiles. These early features translate to diversification in the mature spinal cord, in which neuronal subpopulations exhibit differential spatial distribution patterns, neurotransmitter http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ly2157299.html profiles, GDC0199 connectivity matrices including

synaptic in- and output, and functional properties (Figure 5C). Although interneuron populations are often loosely categorized along a single dimension (e.g., transcriptional, neurotransmitter, or spatial profile), these same interneurons may in fact be functionally multifaceted (Edgley, 2001 and Jankowska, 2008), which complicates classification criteria. Analysis of connectivity profiles provides ample evidence that many spinal interneurons establish connections over many segments, and individual motor neuron pools receive direct input from segmentally widely distributed interneuron populations (Stepien et al., 2010 and Tripodi et al., 2011). Consequently, many spinal “interneurons” exhibit properties analogous to long-distance projection neurons not unlike pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex and therefore cannot be strictly considered to function as local interneurons. Neurons in the spinal cord of this category exhibit fundamentally different connectivity profiles and functions, including excitatory and inhibitory subtypes. On the other end of Lacidipine the spectrum, Renshaw cells or spinal interneuron populations in the substantia gelatinosa (Brown, 1981 and Todd, 2010) can be considered more similar to locally projecting cortical interneurons

such as fast-spiking Parvalbumin interneurons (Isaacson and Scanziani, 2011), both contributing exclusively to local circuit computations. In the cortex, one defining arbiter for the use of the term “interneuron” is based on the fact that these neurons migrate into the cortex from distant sites (i.e., ganglionic eminence) and many of them project locally (Fishell and Rudy, 2011, Gelman and Marín, 2010 and Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008). In contrast, spinal neurons are generated locally, eliminating this distinguishing parameter. For future reference, it will be important to consider that the commonly used terminology “spinal interneurons” embraces a bewildering array of functionally distinct neuronal subtypes in sum charged with local as well as long-distance computations in the spinal cord (Figure 5C).