1 g of soy fibre) samples. The recovery for each analyte was calculated from the content found in the fortified sample in relation to the expected amount, subtracting the non-spiked sample content. Precision (repeatability)

was determined for each analyte as the coefficient of variation from the three replicates analysed in the recovery experiment. For isoflavones, which were quantified using the diode array detector (DAD), the limits of detection (LOD) and of quantification (LOQ) were calculated using the following equations: Duvelisib ic50 LOD = 3.3 (σ/S); LOQ = 10 (σ/S), where σ is the standard deviation of the response of a blank (calculated from the linear coefficient of three calibration curves) and S is the mean angular coefficient of three calibration curves. For soyasaponins, which were quantified using the mass spectrometer (MS), LOD and LOQ were

calculated as the concentrations equivalent to three and ten times the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), respectively, of the lowest concentration calibration curve point. S/N ratios were calculated by LCMSolutions software, using a built-in tool. The employment of S/N ratio is preferable in comparison to calibration check details curves parameters for LOD and LOQ calculations, as the latter approach tends to underestimate these values. Samples were extracted in triplicate according to a modification of the methods of Genovese and Lajolo, 2002 and Fang et al., 2004 and Rostagno, Palma, and Barroso (2005). Briefly, 0.1 g of sample and 4 ml of aqueous methanol 80% was extracted in an Ultra-Turrax extractor (IKA®, T18 Basic) at 22,000 rpm for one min. The obtained extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, the supernatant collected and the residue re-extracted twice following the same procedure. Next, supernatants were combined and placed

in an ultrasound bath for 15 min. The organic solvent was removed with the aid of a rota-evaporator at 170 rpm (Büchi©, 131 EL, Switzerland). Oxalosuccinic acid The concentrated extract was introduced into a Strata-X solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge (3 ml, 200 mg, Phenomenex®, CA, USA), previously conditioned with 10 ml of methanol and 10 ml of water. The impurities contained in the extract were eluted with 10 ml of water and the cartridge was vacuum-dried for 15 min. The analytes were eluted with5 ml of methanol and the final extract was properly diluted with water prior to HPLC-DAD–MS analysis. The LC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) comprised a LC-10ADvp quaternary pump, a CTO-10ASvp column oven, an 8125 manual injector (Rheodyne) with a 20 μL loop and a SPD-M10Avp DAD. This LC system was coupled to a LC–MS 2010 MS (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an electrospray ion source. Chromatographic separations were achieved using a Kromasil® C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å, AkzoNobel, Bohus, Sweden) maintained at a constant temperature of 40 °C. The LC two-phase mobile system consisted of a gradient of water (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B), both added with 0.