0 aLRT), 2) the default substitution model was selected assuming an estimated proportion of invariant sites (of 0.474) and 4 gamma-distributed rate categories to account for rate heterogeneity across sites, 3) the gamma shape parameter was estimated directly from the data (gamma = 0.470), 4) reliability for internal branch was assessed using the ML bootstrapping method (500 ML bootstrap replicates),

5) transition weighted four times over transversion and log likelihood = −9403,75196. Estimated base frequencies were: f(A) = 0.22636, f(C) = 0.269792, selleckchem f(G) = 0.26798 and f(T) = 0.23773. Sequence file: phymlla96ToTm4/input.phy. Bayesian analyses were monitored by software Mr Bayes v3.1 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). According to the Bayesian Information Criterium (BIC) score, SYM + G + I and K80 + G (K2P; Kimura 1980) were chosen respectively for combined (ITS + RPB2) and 28S sequences analyses as the optimal substitution model defined by TOPALi v2.5 (Milne et al. 2004). Bayesian analyses were conducted using four Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with one tree sampled per 100th. The first 5000 trees were excluded of our analyses. For the both Bayesian

analysis, potential scale reduction factors (PSRF) were reasonably close to 1.0 for all parameters. Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (Bayesian PP) of each node were obtained with majority rules with all compatible partitions. Y-27632 supplier Whatever the method, gaps were scored as missing and trees were rooted

by Midpoint rooting application. Selection of outgroups Initial analyses based on ITS sequences (not shown here) confirmed that several species fell outside of the core genus Trametes and of the related genera. Among these, Hexagonia nitida, Daedaleopsis tricolor and Trametella trogii (syn. Funalia trogii; for a comparison Aspartate between Funalia and Trametella especially based on polarity: see (Pieri and Rivoire 2007) were selected as outgroups since all were shown to belong to the sister “subclade A” of Ko (2000). A strain identified as Trametes mimetes was found from our preliminary analysis to be closely related to Hexagonia nitida, as suggested earlier by Reid (1975), therefore the name Hexagonia mimetes (Wakef.) D.A.Reid is retained here assuming a correct identification of the strain (voucher specimen not seen). This species had not been included in previous phylogenetic works (e.g. Tomšovský et al. 2006), The corresponding sequences were also used as outgroups. Results of the phylogenetic analysis Morphological analysis All 31 collections have been observed, including the type material of Lenzites acutus, Trametes cingulata, T. lactinea, T. menziesii, T. ochroflava, T. sclerodepsis and T. subectypus, in order to confirm field identifications.