The tourism infrastructure is dominantly controlled by the Kinh see more majority, while the other minorities mainly deliver labour force to run the tourism industry. In order to evaluate the potential impact of tourism activities on forest cover in Sa Pa, three land cover maps were compiled based on LANDSAT images available from the U.S. Geological Survey archives (http://glovis.usgs.gov). One LANDSAT-patch (path/row 128/45) covers the whole Sa Pa district with a resolution of 30 m by 30 m. The Landsat images

date from Feb 1, 1993 (just after the opening for international tourism), Nov 4, 2006 (midst of the evaluation period) and Jan 02, 2014 (current state). All images were taken in the post-harvest period when the arable fields are bare. All Landsat images in the freely available USGS archive are orthorectified with precision terrain correction level L1T (Vanonckelen et al., 2013). All images were then corrected for atmospheric and topographic effects using the MODTRAN-4 code and the semi-empirical topographic correction implemented in ATCOR2/3 (Richter, 2011 and Balthazar et al., 2012). Then, a supervised maximum likelihood classification was carried out to map the following 5 land cover categories (Fig. 2): forest, shrub, arable land, water body and urban area. Spectral signatures for the different land cover types were identified

by delineating training areas on the basis of field work SCH 900776 order carried out in 2010 (Fig. 5). The accuracy of the land cover maps was assessed by comparing the classified land cover with visual interpretations of very high resolution remote sensing data. For 1993, the comparison was done with aerial photographs (MONRE, 1993); for 2006 with a VHR-SPOT4 image (MONRE, 2006) and for 2014 with a VHR-SPOT5 image (MONRE, 2012). Random sampling of validation points was done with n = 219 for the 1993 map, n = 315 for the 2006 map, and n = 306 for the 2014 map. The number of

sample points per land cover class varied from 3 to 111, depending on the areal cover of the classes. For all randomly selected points, the land cover was compared with the classified land cover. This comparison allowed to assess the overall accuracy, quantity disagreement next and allocation disagreement (in %) following the procedures described by Pontius and Millones (2011). In order to analyze land cover change trajectories over 3 timeperiods, the change trajectories were grouped in 6 classes: (1) deforestation (change from any class of forest to non-forest), (2) reforestation (change from non-forest to forest), (3) land abandonment (change from agricultural land to shrub or forest), (4) expansion of arable land (conversion from shrub to arable land), (5) other changes, and (6) no change (Table 1). The original classes ‘water body’ and ‘urban area’ that only occupy a minor fraction of the land were not taken into consideration.