As a general observation, the iIEL compartment showed substantially higher basal [Ca2+]i levels than systemic T cells (Fig. 1B). The systemic populations had equal basal [Ca2+]i levels, though 50% less in relation to iIEL populations (Fig. 1B). In spite of these differences, all five T-cell populations showed robust ionomycin-induced Ca2+-fluxes (Fig. 1C). However, Ca2+ response amplitudes were higher in CD8+ p-αβ and CD8− p-γδ representing systemic T cells. Next, we studied the Ca2+-flux of isolated iIEL or systemic T cells from γδ reporter mice after TCR-clustering with antibodies. For this, we applied an anti-γδ TCR mAb clone (GL3) and an anti-CD3ε clone (145-2C11, here 2C11) and subsequently clustered

them on the cell surface with secondary goat anti-hamster antibody. This procedure induced robust anti-CD3-induced Ca2+-fluxes in the systemic populations CD8+ p-αβ and CD8− p-γδ (Fig. 1D). Similarly, clustering BIBW2992 ic50 with anti-γδ TCR mAb specifically induced

Ca2+-flux of systemic CD8− p-γδ cells (Fig. 1D). However, in the iIEL compartment, we observed discrete Ca2+-fluxes in response to anti-CD3 or anti-γδ TCR mAb only in CD8− i-γδ but not in CD8+ i-γδ (Fig. 1E). This suggested that high basal [Ca2+]i levels in γδCD8αα+iIEL correlated with TCR-unresponsiveness. Taken together, we found that systemic αβ and γδ T cells showed comparable Ca2+-flux responses to TCR ligation, whereas https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ensartinib-x-396.html CD8αα+ αβ and γδ iIEL were presumably pre-activated and thus refractory to further stimulation of the TCR complex and displayed high intrinsic [Ca2+]i levels. These results suggest a chronic stimulation of CD8α+ iIEL in vivo. Next, we sought to investigate the outcome of αβ- and γδ-specific TCR stimulation on isolated iIEL in ex vivo stimulation assays. Since systemic γδ T cells in lymph nodes, spleen and circulation 19, 21, 34 as well as intraepithelial γδ T cells in the skin 35 have been described to be biased to produce IL-17A, we tested whether this pro-inflammatory cytokine was produced by intestinal γδ Fludarabine cell line iIEL. We found that, irrespective of CD8α expression,

γδ iIEL did not produce IL-17A upon stimulation with anti-TCR mAb or PMA/ionomycin (Fig. 2). This is in accordance with a recent report showing that intestinal γδ IEL are not ‘pre-wired’ toward a specific lineage 36. Therefore, we focused in this study on the well-established γδ IEL effector molecules CC chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) and IFN-γ. Chemokine and cytokine production of αβ, γδ and total iIEL from WT mice was monitored by stimulation with plate-bound anti-γδ TCR (GL3 and GL4), anti-αβ TCR (H57-597, called H57) and anti-CD3 (2C11), respectively, followed by cytokine measurement in the supernatants. Here, αβ or γδ TCR triggering induced similar concentrations of CCL4 (Fig. 3A, upper panel), whereas higher amounts of IFN-γ were produced through anti-αβ TCR stimulation (Fig. 3A, lower panel).