6A, upper right for schematic representation). As revealed by tracking of a statistically relevant number of cells per sample (between 30 and 90 cells were analyzed, representative examples are shown in Fig. 6A), both SEMA6A and SEMA3A affected T-cell motility. Selleckchem Volasertib For SEMA3A, this

did, however, not receive statistical relevance as compared to the IgG control (Fig. 6A, bottom right panel). The ability of exogenous SEMA3A, but not SEMA6A to cause reduction of allogeneic T-cell expansion in MLRs by approximately 30% has been reported earlier 34, and we thus reasoned that these compounds might interfere with IS efficiency at the level of conjugate formation. To analyze this directly, DC and allogeneic T cells were pre-labelled prior to co-cultures and the frequency

of conjugates formed in the presence of SEMA3A, -6A or IgG was determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 6B). Both SEMAs detectably reduced conjugate frequencies measured after 20 and 30 min (Fig. 6B, left panel, for 30 min shown in Fig. 6B, right panel) and this almost numerically matched with the data published on MLR inhbition by SEMA3A 34. As already evident from the migration experiment, SEMA6A more effiently interferred with conjugate formation, and this could not be compensated for by increasing SEMA3A doses (Fig. 6B, and not shown). Corroborating our hypothesis of SEMA3/6A directly interferring with T-cell activation at the IS level, pre-exposure to SEMAs, yet not to IgG (included as a control) largely abolished recruitment of CD3 to the interface (Fig. 6C). Though we repeatedly tried, we were unable to increase conjugate frequencies AP24534 concentration in MV-DC/T-cell co-cultures by neutralization of SEMA3A, and this is most likely due to the presence of the MV gp complex in the interface previously shown to largely account for IS destabilization in these cultures 10. Altogether, these findings support the interpretation that of SEMA receptor ligation by SEMA3A and -6A affect motility and, at Thymidine kinase IS level, activation of T cells and thus, modulations in kinetic and levels of their expression or subcellular redistribution of

their receptors by MV infection would be expected to contribute to immunosuppression. Measles pathogenesis is marked by the paradoxon of a coincident efficient virus-specific immune activation and generalized immunosuppression. The latter is characterized in vivo by lymphopenia and cytokine imbalance reflected by an early switch to a Th2-dominated response, while ex vivo, a failure of PBMCs to expand in response to mitogenic stimulation is observed (recently reviewed in 42). The frequency of infected PBMCs is, however low, indicating that indirect mechanisms, such as soluble mediators (which have not been revealed), or contact-mediated signalling causing inappropriate propagation of activation signals may account for the observation.