Materials and Methods: Five implants of Astra Tech, Bego, Camlog, Friadent, Nobel Biocare, and Straumann were separately embedded in stainless steel tubes using polyurethane, for a total of 30 specimens. Specimens were statically loaded under an angle of 30° with respect to the implant axis in a universal testing machine using a test setup according to ISO 14801. Failure was indicated by a load drop of 100 N in force. Load–displacement curves Metabolism inhibitor were analyzed, and maximum force and force at which permanent deformation occurred were recorded. Statistical

analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with the level of significance set at 0.05. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that the type of implant–abutment connection design has a significant influence on load bearing capacity (p < 0.001). The mean maximum forces ranged between 606 N (Straumann) and 1129 N (Bego); the forces where plastic deformation set in ranged between 368 N (Friadent) and 955 N (Bego). Failure modes differed between the various implant–abutment connection types tested. Conclusions:

Implant–abutment connection design has a significant influence on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants; however, all implant–abutment connection designs tested would be expected to withstand clinically relevant forces. “
“Purpose: To assess Lumacaftor the effect of three implant abutment angulations and two types of fibers selleckchem on the fracture resistance of overlaying Ceramage single crowns. Materials and Methods: Three groups, coded A to C, with different implant abutment angulations (group A/0°, group B/15°, and group C/30° angulation) were restored with 45 overlay composite restorations; 15 Ceramage crowns for each angulation. Groups A, B, and C were further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 5) coded: 1, crowns without fiber reinforcement; 2, crowns with Connect polyethylene reinforcement; and 3, crowns with Interlig glass reinforcement. All crowns were constructed by one technician using the Ceramage System. The definitive restorations (before cementation) were stored in distilled water at mouth temperature (37°C) for 24 hours prior to testing. Before

testing, the crowns were cemented using Temp Bond. The compressive load required to break each crown and the mode of failure were recorded. The speed of testing was 1 mm/min. The results were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The tested crowns were examined using a stereomicroscope at 40×, and selected crowns (five randomly selected from each group) were further examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to reveal the composite–fiber interface. Results: Fracture resistance of single crowns was not affected (p > 0.05) by the different abutment angulations chosen (0°, 15°, 30°) or fiber reinforcement (Connect and Interlig fibers). Crowns in group A exhibited average loads to fracture (N) of A1 = 843.57 ± 168.20, A2 = 1389.20 ± 193.