Methods: Field studies were made of the effect of a surrounding ring (10 m radius) of 20 cattle on the numbers of mosquitoes collected by human-baited sampling methods (i) inside or (ii) outside a hut.
Results: The numbers of An. arabiensis caught outdoors by a human landing catch (HLC) with or without a ring of cattle were not significantly different (2 x 2 Latin square comparisons: means = 24.8 and 37.2 mosquitoes/night, respectively; buy Napabucasin n = 12, P > 0.22, Tukey HSD), whereas, the numbers of An. pharoensis
caught were significantly reduced (44%) by a ring of cattle (4.9 vs. 8.7; n = 12, P < 0.05). The catch of An. arabiensis in human-baited traps (HBT) was 25 times greater than in cattle-baited traps (CBT) (34.0 vs. 1.3, n = 24; P < 0.001) whereas, for An. pharoensis there was no significant
difference. Furthermore, HBT and CBT catches were unaffected by a ring of cattle (4 x 4 Latin square comparison) for either An. arabiensis (n = 48; P > 0.999) or An. pharoensis (n = 48, P > 0.870). The HLC catches indoors vs. outdoors were CP-868596 price not significantly different for either An. arabiensis or An. pharoensis (n = 12, P > 0.969), but for An. arabiensis only, the indoor catch was reduced significantly by 49% when the hut was surrounded by cattle (Tukey HSD, n = 12, P > 0.01).
Conclusions: Outdoors, a preponderance of cattle (20: 1, cattle: humans) does not provide any material zooprophylactic effect against biting by An. arabiensis. For a human indoors, the presence of
cattle outdoors nearly halved the catch. Unfortunately, this level of reduction would not have an AZD4547 mouse appreciable impact on malaria incidence in an area with typically > 1 infective bite/person/night. For An. pharoensis, cattle significantly reduced the human catch indoors and outdoors, but still only by about half. These results suggest that even for traditional pastoralist communities of East Africa, the presence of large numbers of cattle does not confer effective zooprophylaxis against malaria transmitted by An. arabiensis or An. pharoensis.”
“Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser welding of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) at our centre.
Methods Between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2010, eight patients underwent laser welding of vesicovaginal fistula. The mean age was 44 years (35-55). The VVF were primary (failing to heal following conservative management) in five and secondary (recurring following primary repair) in three cases. The mean fistula size was 3 mm (range, 2-4). Neodymium yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser was used for the initial case, and in the remaining seven cases, holmium YAG laser was used for circumferential welding of the fistula.