36,154–158 As described above, such interactions with voriconazol

36,154–158 As described above, such interactions with voriconazole HSP activation are likely to be bidirectional. While in some cases, the reduction in voriconazole concentrations can be overcome in the short-term by increasing its dose, ultimately that will lead to accumulation of the inducing agent and further induction.136,155 Similar to voriconazole, interactions between posaconazole and rifabutin is bidirectional. Initially posaconazole increases rifabutin

Cmax and systemic exposure by 31% and 72% respectively.159 However, subsequently rifabutin reduces the posaconazole Cmax and AUCτ by 43% and 49% respectively.159 As discussed above, one study demonstrates that posaconazole interacts with phenytoin. Despite the limitations of that study, which were previously mentioned, steady-state posaconazole Cmax and systemic exposure were significantly reduced by phenytoin co-administration. There was also a 57% reduction in half-life and a 90% increase in steady-state clearance of orally administered posaconazole.137 Posaconazole is primarily metabolised via UGT pathways (phase II enzymes), and therefore it is likely that induction of UGT

pathways and CYP3A4 by phenytoin contributed to the interaction.137 Although fluconazole undergoes MG 132 little CYP-mediated metabolism, drugs such as rifampin and its derivatives can accelerate its biotransformation, which significantly

reduces its systemic exposure.160 Short-term administration of voriconazole with ritonavir initially increases voriconazole plasma concentrations, particularly among those who are CYP2C19 poor metabolisers.125 However, with chronic co-administration, ritonavir produces significant (82%) reductions in voriconazole exposure.126 These changes are likely a result of CYP2C19 induction by ritonavir. The disparate findings by these two studies illustrate the impact of study design on demonstrating induction. Induction interactions typically involve the synthesis of new enzymes, which takes time to manifest. In contrast, inhibition involves binding existing enzymes and thus they occur more rapidly. Therefore, Bcl-w combined these studies demonstrate that initially ritonavir exerts an inhibitory effect on voriconazole disposition, which may predispose the patient for voriconazole toxicity early in the course of co-administration, However, with continued co-administration the inducing effects of ritonavir predominate, which may lead to microbiologic failure or breakthrough fungal infections. Similar to ritonavir, efavirenz induces the metabolism of voriconazole. When co-administered with voriconazole (400 mg daily in divided doses) in healthy volunteers, efavirenz (400 mg daily) decreased voriconazole exposure (80%) and maximum serum concentrations (66%).

Comments are closed.